Compare Workee with
other med spa software
Ten side-by-side comparisons. Every competitor price is quoted from that vendor’s own public pricing page, with the date it was read. Each page also names what the other platform does better than Workee.
In short: Workee compared with ten med spa platforms (Boulevard, Zenoti, Mangomint, Vagaro, Fresha, GlossGenius, AestheticsPro, Square Appointments, Pabau and Aesthetic Record), with every competitor price quoted from the vendor’s own pricing page, plus six platform-vs-platform comparisons.
Updated
Ten comparisons, every figure cited
Pick the platform you are weighing Workee against. Each page covers pricing, what that platform does better, who should choose it, and what a switch involves.
Workee vs Boulevard
A premium front-of-house platform for multi-service spas.
Workee vs Zenoti
An enterprise platform sold by quote to multi-location groups.
Workee vs Mangomint
A single-plan platform with unusually transparent pricing.
Workee vs Vagaro
A low-entry, heavily-metered platform priced per calendar.
Workee vs Fresha
A marketplace-led platform that charges commission on new clients.
Workee vs GlossGenius
A beauty-first platform with a separate medspa tier.
Workee vs AestheticsPro
An EMR-first platform for clinically-led practices.
Workee vs Square Appointments
A free-tier booking and POS product with no clinical layer.
Workee vs Pabau
A clinic management system priced by seat, with most costs unpublished.
Workee vs Aesthetic Record
A charting-led EMR for injectables practices.
Alternatives to your current platform
Leaving Vagaro, Boulevard, Zenoti, Aesthetic Record, Pabau or another platform? See what med spas compare it with, and when staying is the better call.
Data export guides
How to get your clients, appointments and history out of your current platform before you switch, and what to confirm in writing.
Platform reviews
Every published price, where each platform is strong, where it falls short, and what leaving it involves.
Best software by practice type
Shortlists for med spas, estheticians and massage practices, compared on what each vendor publishes.
Comparing two other platforms? These put them side by side.
Vagaro vs Fresha
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
Boulevard vs Zenoti
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
Mangomint vs Boulevard
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
Vagaro vs GlossGenius
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
Zenoti vs Vagaro
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
Boulevard vs Vagaro
Every published price, forms, ePrescribe and data export, from each vendor’s own pages.
⚖️
Still not sure which one fits your practice?
Fifteen minutes on your own calendar, including when the right answer is one of the other ten.
How we write these comparisons
Every competitor figure comes from the vendor
The URL and the date each pricing page was read are recorded alongside every figure. Nothing is copied from a software directory and presented as a vendor rate card.
Gaps are stated as gaps
Several platforms publish little or nothing. Zenoti and Pabau publish no prices at all. Where a figure is unpublished, the page says so instead of filling the space with an estimate.
Workee’s own pricing is not published either
Workee is quoted per clinic, based on your needs, with no contracts. That is a real disadvantage when you are comparing costs at eleven at night, and these pages say so rather than working around it.
Each page says what the other platform does better
Prescribing, clinical records, published pricing, marketplaces: where a competitor is ahead, the page names it. If two or more of their reasons describe you, we would rather you knew before a migration than after one.
